IRS Accused of Discriminately Targeting Conservative Groups

The Internal Revenue Service, the agency responsible for collecting taxes and enforcing tax laws, is facing intense scrutiny after it was revealed that it has been unfairly targeting audits and investigations at conservative groups.

IRS controversyThe issue comes from certain kinds of groups who can apply for tax-exempt status. Many of these groups are allowed to hide their donor lists and are used to raise money for politicians, meaning an individual can use them to contribute more money to an election campaign than normally allowed by law. The IRS’s goal was to do something to fight this practice.

However, it faltered because its investigations targeted primarily conservative Tea Party organizations, potentially having an effect on election results and shaking national confidence in how tax laws are enforced.

Two high-ranking IRS officials have resigned because of this scandal and congressional hearings are being held to get to the bottom of what happened. One of the main focal points will be finding exactly whose idea it was to target conservative groups.

Women Face Pregnancy Discrimination Despite Federal Protections

After being laid off, a woman has filed a lawsuit against her former employer claiming her firing was unfair and discriminatory. The suit alleges that she was fired not because of downsizing, but as retaliation for taking maternity leave twice in as many years.

The Family and Medical Leave Act guarantees women unpaid maternity leave and further state protections in New Hampshire allow women to return to their position (or a sufficiently similar one) when that leave ends. The woman in the suit took maternity leave in 2009 after receiving a good performance review months before. Shortly after she put in the request for maternity leave for her second pregnancy in early 2011, her performance review score fell dramatically under the reasoning that she had become unreliable. pregnancy discrimination

The Equal Employment Opportunity Commission reports that pregnancy discrimination cases have risen over the past 15 years nationwide. This presents a clear problem that needs creative solutions that are mutually beneficial and fair to families and employers.

Despite all of the laws in place designed to protect people from discrimination, it continues to be a prevalent problem across the nation.

Nursing Home Sexual Abuse

Click here for more infoNursing homes are meant to be places in which elderly individuals are given the care and medical attention they need in order to remain in good health. For many families, the difficult decision to place an individual in a nursing home is eased by the fact that they know their loved ones will get the best cares possible in these circumstances.

Unfortunately, not all nursing care facilities give this standard of care to their residents. In fact, nursing home abuse is a serious problem in the United States. The victims of nursing home abuse can suffer from serious physical and psychological problems, and they may develop serious health conditions as a result. This can be particularly threatening to elderly individuals, who are not well conditioned to handle this type of physical damage.

One of the most devastating types of abuse which nursing home residents might be the victims of is sexual abuse. While most people cannot bring themselves to consider this possibility as a risk that their loved ones may face in a nursing home, the reality is that nursing home sexual abuse has become a serious issue among elderly individuals in the United States.

Sexual abuse in nursing homes can occur in several ways. The most common form of nursing home sexual abuse is abuse perpetrated by other residents. In these circumstances, nursing home staff and management are accountable because they failed to provide the security which they should have for their residents.

Sexual abuse can also occur in a nursing home at the hands of the staff themselves. Because nursing home residents are often extremely vulnerable, both from a physical and emotional standpoint, it is easy for unscrupulous individuals to commit this type of horrific abuse against the residents of a nursing home, and in many cases, it can be difficult for family members to recognize the signs that their loved ones have suffered this type of abuse. When cases like nursing home abuse occur, there are legal options victims and their loves ones can pursue. One option is to seek professional assistance from an injury lawyer that has experience in handling sensitive cases dealing with negligence or abuse in the nursing home.

Mass Litigation is Not Always the Best Option for a Pradaxa Lawsuit

Pradaxa manufacturer Boehringer Ingelheim may soon be facing the lawyers representing over 1,000 product liability claims in multidistrict litigation proceedings to be held in Southern Illinois. However, not all cases benefit equally under mass litigation.

While mass litigation is ultimately more effective than individual lawsuits, it is also dehumanizing. With so many cases before the dock, it is inevitable that many of the plaintiffs get sidelined unless their cases have a more dramatic (because more horrific) impact in trial. More often than not, individual plaintiffs in mass litigation are reduced to a case number, and even the lawyers have a hard time remembering their names.

A Pradaxa lawsuit, like any case where a drug is involved, is highly personal. Each case is different, and while some have more severe reactions than others, the degree of impact on each person will vary. For example, if both Paul and Peter suffer from internal bleeding as a result of taking Pradaxa, the impact on Paul’s life, who is a construction worker, is much greater than Peter who is an office worker. It is still possible for Peter to work, while Paul will most likely have to stop. In mass litigation, the finer points of a case can be overlooked or ignored because there are simply too many cases that need to be considered. In all probability, Peter and Paul will receive the same compensation although Paul actually suffered more.

Mass litigation is useful for all concerned because it brings to the fore the breadth and width of a particular problem, such as the health risks posed by Pradaxa. Individual cases that will come in the wake of a successful (for the plaintiffs) mass litigation will most probably go more smoothly because a precedent has been set. There is truly strength in numbers. But for the individual plaintiff, a more personal approach to a Pradaxa lawsuit will ensure that the representation is thorough and comprehensive. If you or someone you know intends to file a Pradaxa lawsuit, consult with a Pradaxa lawyer in your area first before considering signing up for mass litigation.